Premises liability

Slip and fall at a store, restaurant or other business

Last updated:

A store, restaurant or other business must use reasonable care to keep its premises safe for customers (Civil Code § 1714). In a slip-and-fall claim the key question is usually notice: whether the business knew, or should have known, about the hazard long enough to clean it up, block it off or warn (CACI No. 1011).

This page is for customers and visitors who were hurt in a store, supermarket, restaurant, shopping center, gas station or similar business open to the public.

The business's duty to customers

Everyone is responsible for injuries caused by a lack of ordinary care in managing their property (Civil Code § 1714). For premises, California's jury instructions say the owner or occupier must use reasonable care to discover unsafe conditions and to repair, replace or adequately warn of them (CACI No. 1001). The business is negligent if a condition created an unreasonable risk of harm, it knew or reasonably should have known about it, and it failed to repair it, protect against it or warn (CACI No. 1003).

Notice: how long was the hazard there?

Most store and restaurant falls turn on notice. There are three common ways to show it:

  • The business created the hazard. If an employee acting within the scope of the job caused the spill, set out the mat or left the pallet, the business is treated as knowing about it (CACI No. 1012).
  • The business actually knew. A prior complaint, a cone placed and then removed, or an employee who saw the spill.
  • The business should have known. The question is whether the condition was of such a nature and existed long enough that the business had time to discover it and fix it, protect against it or warn. The instruction adds that a business must make reasonable inspections, and that a failure to inspect within a reasonable time before the fall may show the condition existed long enough (CACI No. 1011).

That is why inspection and sweep logs, the time stamps on video, and the condition of the spill itself (dried edges, cart tracks, footprints) often decide these cases.

Obvious hazards and shared fault

A business does not have to warn about a condition so obvious that a person could reasonably be expected to see it, but it must still use reasonable care if it is foreseeable that people will have to encounter it anyway (CACI No. 1004). If the injured customer was also careless, California reduces the damages by that person's percentage of responsibility rather than barring the claim (CACI No. 405).

Evidence to gather

  1. Report the fall to a manager before you leave and ask for a copy of the incident report, or at least the report number and the manager's name.
  2. Photograph the hazard, the surrounding floor, any warning signs (or their absence) and the lighting.
  3. Get names and phone numbers of witnesses, including employees who responded.
  4. Send a written request to the business, as soon as possible, to preserve surveillance video and inspection or cleaning logs. Many camera systems record over old footage.
  5. Keep your receipt, your shoes and the clothing you wore.
  6. Get medical care promptly and keep every record and bill.

Deadlines

Most injury lawsuits must be filed within two years (CCP § 335.1). If the place was run by a public entity, such as a city-owned facility, a written claim is usually due within six months (Gov. Code § 911.2).

Common questions

Do I have to prove exactly how long the spill was on the floor?

Not to the minute. The question is whether it existed long enough that a business using reasonable care, including reasonable inspections, would have found it (CACI No. 1011). Video time stamps and inspection logs are often the best proof.

What if an employee caused the spill?

If an employee acting within the scope of the job created the condition, the business is treated as knowing about it, so you don't have to prove how long it was there (CACI No. 1012).

I was looking at the shelves, not the floor. Can I still recover?

Possibly. California compares fault: if you were partly careless, your damages are reduced by your percentage of responsibility (CACI No. 405).

Does this apply to a fall in the parking lot?

The same premises rules apply to whoever owns, leases, occupies or controls the parking lot (CACI No. 1000), which may be the store, the shopping center owner or a management company.

Related pages

Sources

  1. Cal. Civ. Code § 1714: General duty of ordinary care
  2. Judicial Council of California Civil Jury Instructions (CACI), 2026 edition
  3. Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1: Two-year limitations period for assault, battery, personal injury, or wrongful death
  4. Cal. Gov. Code § 911.2: Time for presentation of claims against public entities

Hurt in Riverside County?

Talk with our Riverside team about what happened. Consultations are free, in English or Spanish.

Call (951) 848-5376Send a message